Genesis, the seven days of Creation ... Where does the text that makes up the first part of the Bible come from?
Is its text a mere introductory poem ... or is it a narrative?
What's behind its words?
Alberto Canen has found an alternative way to answer these and other questions in the Genesis. He has found a route no one had been to before, and invites the reader to discover it and make their findings with him.
The author has found that hidden in the bottom of the plot there is someone.
Someone who observes; someone who tells. Someone who tells what he observes. And a place, a location from which he observes.
The location of the observer.
The key to an exciting puzzle.
The Genesis has been a mystery for thousands of years. No one had been able to understand what the text spoke about, whether it was just an introductory poem to the Holy Scriptures, or it actually contained information about the Creation.
The text of Genesis divided the waters of creationists and scientistics long until today.
With this book I hope to dilute this separation between scientistics and creationists since I have discovered the key that unifies both worlds.
I think the key to the mystery of Genesis is to understand that it is narrated by someone. A narrator of Genesis. Someone who observes the vision God gives him and from there he tells what he observes and he observes it from his human and earthly location.
This earthly and accurate location is the key to understanding Genesis.
More than 50,000 books sold, ranking 80.000 author
While our block of Arabia drifts on the ocean, that small sector-that millions of years later would be Mesopotamia- is a beach, a long beach that stretches in front of the ocean. But beware, because it is not just any beach. Before starting the drift-or we could say at the time it was still part of that one continent- that region is a small coastal edge of Pangaea. Then, after moving, it continues being a beach until it collides with Asia and it´s no longer a beach-at least in part- to become an inland region. But, and here's another very interesting "but", the field left inland is just the land which becomes Mesopotamia while the rest of the coast remains a beach, the Gulf Beach.
Thus, we could explain why our observer saw first algae-plants, then sea animals- sea monsters and birds while Pangaea drifts- and finally land animals -without monsters (because there weren´t any dinosaurs any more)- and at the very end, men.
I should make a small remark: in the narrative, referring to marine animals he speaks of "monsters", but when he mentions land animals, he doesn´t. Why? Yeah, I wonder why some sea animals seemed monstrous but the land animals didn´t?
| Language | Status |
|---|---|
|
French
|
Already translated.
|
|
Italian
|
Already translated.
|
|
Portuguese
|
Already translated.
|
|
Spanish
|
Unavailable for translation.
|
